Fiction

Revisiting Wendell Berry’s “Fidelity”

Yesterday, we buried my daughter’s hamster. She was injured a week ago, then endured a trip to the vet and a week of pain medication before quietly slipping away.

Did she die of her injuries — or of starvation because the medications so drugged her that she couldn’t eat? Did we help her feel more comfortable, as we so longed to do — or did we increase her pain? Did the trip to the vet help or hurt? Bad enough that she was injured. Worse still if in the longing to help, we were complicit in further injury.

I don’t mean to trivialize the many large tragedies of the world, but the truth is there are no small deaths. Death, especially where any degree of love is involved, always brings us face to face with difficulties and mysteries.

For the Christian, this is a week when the questions of suffering and death and mystery are in the air anyway. I wish I could say that my reading of the Bible has been enough, but this year my threadbare imagination has needed help weaving together the different strands that trouble my mind and heart with the familiar yet enduring mystery of the gospel story. I remembered that Wendell Berry’s short story “Fidelity,” from the collection of the same title, dealt with some of the things I’m thinking about, so I returned to it yesterday.

There will be spoilers here, so, fair warning.

“Fidelity” concerns the last days of Burley Coulter, a beloved member of the Port William community of Berry’s fiction. He is 82 years old and failing, and all those who love him are troubled with the feeling that they need to do something to help. So they take him to a doctor, who checks him into a hospital. Before long Burley is an unrecognizable wraith on a hospital bed, hooked up to needles and tubes under the glare of the institutional lights. How truly Berry writes the response of Burley’s friends and family:

When they returned on yet another visit and found the old body still as it had been, a mere passive addition to the complicated machines that kept it minimally alive, they saw finally that in their attempt to help they had not helped but only complicated his disease beyond their power to help. And they thought with regret of the time when the thing that had been wrong with him had been simply unknown, and there had been only it and him and him and them in the place they had known together. Loving him, wanting to help him, they had given him over to “the best of modern medical care” — which meant, as they now saw, that they had abandoned him.

So Danny Branch, Burley’s son, stages a rescue. I’m not sure why they don’t simply check him out of the hospital, but within the fictional situation Berry creates they are completely powerless. Danny goes to the hospital in the dead of night and takes Burley away with him to a place he knows, and the two spend his final hours together. Meanwhile, a detective questions Danny’s wife Lyda, lawyers Wheeler and Henry Catlett, and eventually the whole Port William membership as they gather in the Catlett offices — a conversation that lays bare the contrasts between the world of technology and organization and institution, and the world of Port William.

The plot borrows some of the ingredients of the Easter story, but made more immanent and less theological. There are several allusions, such as when the janitors at the hospital, watching as Danny wheels Burley away on a gurney, are “as stupefied, apparently, as the soldiers at the Tomb.” There are also two resurrections. Danny, who has hidden the unconscious Burley in a barn while he prepares to dig his grave, returns to check on Burley and is startled to find him awake, eyes open, looking at him. The second resurrection takes place just after Burley dies. As Danny goes back to digging the grave,

Burley returned to his mind, and he knew him again as he had been when his life was full. He saw again the stance and demeanor of the man, the amused eyes, the lips pressed together while speech waited upon thought, an almost inviolable patience in the set of his shoulders. It was as though Burley stood in full view nearby, at ease and well at home — as though Danny could see him, but only on condition that he not look.

One other notable reminder to me of the story’s resonance with Easter is the way Burley’s friends come together in Wheeler’s offices. It’s an upper room experience like those of the disciples after Jesus’ death, first when the Lord himself appears to them, then when the Holy Spirit comes. In this story, it’s Danny who comes into the assembly, bringing with him a spirit of peace: “The room was all ashimmer now with its quiet.” (This scene is beautiful for its contrast to the funeral scene in The Memory of Old Jack too. But I can’t write about everything…)

I love so many things about this story. I love the way Berry weaves his tale in with this larger one. I love the way he works out themes about the right purposes of law and medicine and technology (a theme that’s always percolating in my own thoughts). I love the characters he draws with such exact detail and affection.

Most of all I love the tenderness with which he writes of death and loss and love. Somehow at Easter we can get so focused on the theological import of what Christ has done that we miss the very human story of death and loss and love and confusion. “Fidelity” comforted me without tearing the veil from any of the mysteries, affirming the essential goodness of my longings for understanding and fellowship and meaning. It underlines not only the bewilderments and sorrows of our earthly experience, but the joys. It manages to weave together the strands of so many things I struggle with and hope for.

Sometimes we need the coherence that only poetry can provide. “Fidelity,” as well as the other stories in this collection, lends us the eyes of a poet who can glimpse an underlying unity, and capture in words those shimmers of meaning that go far beyond words.

11 Comments

  • Barbara H.

    I am sorry about poor Teddy. How did the girls take it? That’s one thing about pets — the family has to deal with death, sooner for some pets than others.

    Joni Eareckson Tada wrote a book years ago called When Is It Right to Die that deals with some of the issues involved in the balance between sustaining life and avoiding death. Very thought-provoking.

    It’s a hard call sometimes. Once when my father almost died, my brother’s girlfriend spoke out very strongly against putting him on a ventilator — she had worked with the elderly and seen too many people insensible and yet kept alive by machine. But my father was not in that situation, and I was furious that she was basically advocating letting him die rather than putting him on a ventilator for what promised to be a short time. I think he was on it for about a week, got out of the hospital a while later, and lived another six months. Some might think it wasn’t worth it for six months, but a lot of good things were accomplished in those months, not the least of which was his reconciliation with my brother and my father’s being able to go to his wedding. I do know some people who live on portable ventilators — one man who had the same neurological illness I did but was affected more severely has been on a ventilator for nearly ten years and is not inactive and insensible but began and maintains multiple web sites and message boards for the disabled. So I could never say I am anti-machine and technology — but then again there is a time to turn machines off and let someone go in peace. The hard thing is to know when.

  • Janet

    Yes — I agree with everything you say. I appreciate modern medicine! It can be a tough call sometimes to know when to “disconnect,” but that doesn’t mean there is no time when it’s right to use a ventilator or an I.V. or whatever.

    Probably it’s a good idea to think about it ahead of time and talk to loved ones about one’s preferences.

  • Amy @ Hope Is the Word

    Well, Janet, I think this post probably confirms the sentiment I expressed on MY post. ;-) This is absolutely beautiful, and I can’t wait to read more about Burley Coulter, he who just might be my favorite character of WB’s yet. :-)

  • Carol in Oregon

    Janet. Janet, Janet, Janet.

    I’m printing out this post. Thank you for your insights. They are very helpful.

    I discovered Burley in Berry’s collection of short stories, That Distant Land. My friend had a copy and she got to Fidelity before I did. Every time we met she’d ask, “Have you read Fidelity yet?” And when I did, I knew why it was so important to her.

    Two years ago a group of us went to hear Wendell Berry have a conversation with Michael Pollan about food, agriculture, community. Afterwards while Mr. Berry was signing books, my friend went up to him and asked, “I just want to know what Burley Coulter thinks about all this.” He looked up at her and smiled.

    This just made my day. Thank you, my friend.

  • Janet

    Burley is such a singular character — one of my favorites, too!

    Aren’t the short stories wonderful? I have a few that stay in mind and ask to be revisited on occasion. “Fidelity” is one. “Are You All Right?” is another — almost mythic in some ways. And I think “The Boundary” is a masterpiece.

    So glad to be able to exchange thoughts with another “Wendell-reader”!

  • Bill

    During all the political fighting over national health care, Burley Coulter kept coming to my mind.
    Thanks for giving me something else, far more significant, to ponder.
    Great post.

  • Carol in Oregon

    I also was particularly fond of “A Jonquil for Mary Penn”. I love to turn over a phrase from that story: “She lived in his love as in a spacious house.”

    And “Pray Without Ceasing” demolished my emotional structure for a day. “I am a child of his forgiveness.”

    I sent That Distant Land to my friend in Zimbabwe. She loved it. Berry’s writing translates to many cultures, it does.